Thursday, November 27, 2014
TIDES INN ART SHOW DECEMBER 6TH
I will be at the Tides Inn Art Show in Irvington,Virginia on December 6th. The Art Show will be held from 10:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
PARTICIPATION IN NAACP ART FESTIVAL
The Northumberland County, Virginia chapter of the NAACP has invited me to participate in their fall Art Festival on November 22nd. The Festival will take place from 10:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. and I will be there the whole time signing the Virginia Tech book. From 1:00 p.m. until 2:00 p.m. I will hold a reading and discussion of the book. If you are in Northumberland County, please stop by the Community Center on Brown's Store Road near Wicomoco Church.
Monday, November 3, 2014
LETTER AND REQUEST FOR HELP FROM THE ACLU
Below is the letter I have sent to the Executive Direction of the Virginia ACLU. I am not too optimistic that she will help. She is a friend of Virginia Supreme Court Justice Cleo E. Powell who wrote the decision I am questioning. Furthermore, the ACLU may not want to rock the Virginia Supreme Court's boat. It is worth a try.
Kilmarnock,
Va. 22482
November
3, 2014
Ms. Claire G. Gastanaga
Executive Director
American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia
701 East Franklin St.
Suite 1612
Richmond, Virginia
23219
Ms. Gastanaga,
I enjoyed meeting you and listening to your presentation on
Sunday, the 26th of October at the Unitarian Fellowship in White
Stone. Equality for all people is a basic right of our republic and I strongly
support what you and the ACLU are doing, and have done, to guarantee citizens’
rights—no matter sexual orientation, race, religion, or ethnic background.
As I mentioned, I am a victims’ rights advocate working with
the victims of school shootings here in Virginia and throughout the country. I
take no money for this work.
At issue, and what I am asking the ACLU’s help on, is the Virginia
Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the jury verdict in the Pryde and Peterson
lawsuit against Virginia Tech. The unanimous decision written by Justice Cleo
E. Powell states on page one, “In this case, we
hold that even if there was a special relationship between the Commonwealth and
the students of Virginia Tech, under the facts of the case, there was no duty
for the Commonwealth to warn students about the potential
for criminal acts by third parties.”
Justice Powell then proceeds to get one of the most
important facts wrong. On page two she writes, “Although officers from the
Virginia Tech Police Department were the first on the scene, the Blacksburg
Police Department led the investigation.” Virginia Tech Police Chief Wendell Flinchum
and his department were in charge.
On the morning of April 16, 2007, the investigation of the
double shooting at West Ambler Johnston hall was in the hands of the Virginia
Tech police. Blacksburg Police Chief Kimberley S. Crannis testified to that
fact on the witness stand, and I have confirmation of that fact in a letter
from her (attached).
The investigation of the shootings at West Ambler Johnston
Hall were conducted in accordance with a legal agreement between the town of
Blacksburg and Virginia Tech. That agreement states that the requesting police
department, in this case Virginia Tech, will retain control of the
investigation. That agreement is attached.
I have nearly 50 years experience in intelligence and crime
analysis and currently teach at the University of Richmond, Virginia
Commonwealth University, the FBI, the CIA, and the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police. If one of my students made an error of this magnitude I would flunk that
student.
The error is so egregious that I believe the civil rights of
the Pryde and Peterson families has been violated. To base a decision on facts
and then get facts wrong raises serious questions about the Court’s objectivity
and integrity and merits investigation.
You mentioned that my complaint to the Judicial Inquiry and
Review Commission might not lie in the realm of ACLU activity. But when I
looked at the ACLU Mission Statement, and the Mission Statement’s reference to
civil liberties, I believe this complaint is exactly what the ACLU is all
about. Here is the Mission Statement:
“ACLU
MISSION STATEMENT. Since its
founding in 1920, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has
been the guardian of liberty, working in the nation's courts, legislatures and
communities to defend and preserve individual working rights and liberties
guaranteed by the Constitution and the laws of the United States.”
You also mentioned that you are a friend of Virginia Supreme
Court Justice Cleo E. Powell, author of the decision. If you feel this
friendship would bias you or in any way make it impossible to help me, would
you recuse yourself and help me find another ACLU lawyer who is willing to
help?
The following are highlights
about my work on school shootings in Virginia:
Angela Dales, the mother of my oldest grandchild, was killed
at the first school shooting here in Virginia at the Appalachian School of Law
on January 16, 2002. Following that tragedy I became a victims’ rights
advocate.
I wrote a book on that tragedy, which I have enclosed. I am
sad to say the law school, the legal profession, law enforcement officials, and
state politicians engaged in a campaign of deceit, cover-up, and out-and-out
lies. For example, law school officials told a student to destroy incriminating
evidence. The student made copies of the evidence, gave it to our lawyers and
was willing to testify under oath that he had been asked to destroy
evidence. I detail all this in the book,
and enclose the book for your reference.
In the immediate aftermath of the Virginia Tech rampage, I
offered my files and services to the Tech families. From that offer came a
working relationship. Around five years ago, a father whose son was killed in
the German class at Tech asked me to write a book from the families’
perspective and to expose the lies and cover-up that has taken place. I agreed.
That book, Virginia Tech: Make Sure It
Doesn’t Get Out is also enclosed. Chapter XI gives a detailed analysis of
the trial and the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision.
Again, I am asking for help from the ACLU in filing a
complaint in connection with the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision to nullify
the jury verdict in the Prdye/Peterson jury verdict against Virginia Tech. I
look forward to hearing from you.
I have enclosed a copy of my bio for your information.
Yours
sincerely,
David
Cariens
(804)
435-7065
dcariens@gmail.com
P.S. Here are some of my findings. They are detailed in my
book:
1.
Virginia Tech paid nearly $1 million to two public
relations firms to spin the tragedy. Each family got $100,000 for their dead
child or loved one.
2.
The State of Virginia paid TriData, an
Arlington-based firm that does business with the state, $750,000 to write the
Governor’s Review Panel Report—a conflict of interest. The report is riddled
with errors.
3.
Virginia Tech took three days to set up a Web
site to support school President Charles Steger and Tech Police Chief Wendell
Flinchum. It took Tech four months to set up a Web site in support of the families.
4.
The families had little or no say in the money
that came in to the Hokie Spirit Memorial Fund set up in response to the
tragedy. The school said that $8.5 million represented the bulk of the fund. In
fact, it was $160 million, which Tech apparently put in a general fund.
5.
There is evidence that Virginia Tech Police
Chief Wendell Flinchum did not tell the truth on the witness stand in the
Pryde/Petereson lawsuit against the school.
6.
Virginia Tech Police Chief Wendell Flinchum
violated practically all rules of crime scene analysis at the double homicide
at West Ambler Johnston Hall on April 16, 2007. His lack of professionalism
made the death of 30 people and wounding of 17 others in Norris Hall
inevitable.
cc: Hall & Sethi,
PLC
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
SEEKING ACLU ASSISTANCE
I am in touch with someone from
the ACLU as I prepare to file a formal complaint in connection with the
Virginia Supreme Court's Action in overturning the jury verdict in
Pryde/Peterson suit against Virginia Tech. I will not be filing the complaint
with the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission until after the first of the
year. I still have several volumes of records to go through (I received from
the Attorney General's Office), but it is now almost certain that either the
ex-Attorney General or Justice Cleo Powell did not tell (or write) the truth (a
lie?). It is against the law to present false information to a court of law and
it is against the law for a Supreme Court Justice to interject his or her own
incorrect facts in a decision.
I have next no hope anything will
happen. The old girl/boy network will kick in to protect one of their own. The
person at the ACLU with whom I talked is a friend of Justice Powell. It will be
interesting to watch her ethics and objectivity in practice. I am going to give
it a try and will go forward with or without the support of the ACLU.
Saturday, October 4, 2014
WHEN FACTS AND LIVES NO LONGER MATTER—PART SIX
THE VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT’S RESPONSE
Below is the response I received from the Virginia Supreme
Court. I think it speaks for itself. I would remind readers of my blog that I
now have over five volumes of court documents pertaining to the Supreme Court’s
decision to throw out the jury verdict in the Pryde/Peterson trial. It will
take me some time to go over the 1000+ pages.
It will be interesting to see who did not tell the truth
about who was in charge of the murder scene at West Ambler Johnston Hall in the
middle of the Virginia Tech campus—Attorney General Cuccinelli’s office or the
Virginia Supreme Court?
SUPREME COURT OF
VIRGINIA
Office of the
Executive Secretary
100 North Ninth
Street
Richmond, Virginia
23219-2334
September 9, 2014
Mr. David Cariens
Xxxxx Road
Kilmarnock, Va. 22482
RE: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Mr. Cariens:
Your request for records sent by certified mail to Justice
Cleo E. Powell was received on September 2, 2014 and forwarded to me for
response. You also sent copies of your request to Chief Justice Kinser,
Justices Lemons, Goodwyn, and Millette, and Senior Justices Russell and Lacy.
This response will serve as the response for each of the Justices and Senior
Justices who received such copies.
Justices of the Supreme Court of Virginia are not subject to
the Freedom of Information Act because of the separation of powers contained in
the Constitution of Virginia. Without waiving this objection, please be advised
that neither Justice Powell nor any of Justices or Senior Justices who received
your letter or copies of your letter possess records that are responsive to
your request. Justices may consider only the case record when deciding a case
and such records filed with the Court as part of a case are maintained by the
Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia. The phone number for the Clerk’s Office
for the Supreme Court is (804) 786-2251.
Please note that the Freedom of Information Act does not
apply to “[t]he records required by law to be maintained by the clerks of the
courts of record, as defined in 1-212, and courts not of record, as defined in
16.1-69.5.” Va. Code 2.2-3703 (A)(5). However, case records are generally
public records and are available at the applicable clerks’ offices, unless a
record has been sealed or is otherwise deemed confidential.
Sincerely,
/s/
Kristi S. Wright
Friday, October 3, 2014
The Book People, Richmond, Virginia--Signing October 18th
My next book signing for Virginia Tech: Make Sure It Doesn't Get Out will be at The Book People, 536 Granite Avenue, Richmond, Virginia on October 18th from noon until 2:00 p.m. Hope to see some of you there.
Saturday, September 27, 2014
EMERSON COLLEGE WRITE UP
FYI, below is the write up Emerson College put out in connection with my talk/signing next week.
|
| David S. Cariens Jr., a retired CIA officer, will have a reading and book signing for his book,Virginia Tech: Make Sure It Doesn't Get Out, which dissects the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings that left 32 dead and 17 wounded. He exposes the duplicity of people in positions of trust-politicians, school officials, medical and law enforcement personnel--and concludes that deceit, coverup, and lies are the legacy for families directly affected by the shooting. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)