There seems no end to the depths
the Virginia Attorney General will sink in order to deny justice to the
families of the victims of the Virginia Tech shootings.
The
Attorney General’s office has appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court to
overturn the jury decision that Tech failed to live up to its obligation to
warn the campus that a killer was on the loose. In fact, the Attorney General’s office may have broken the
law in writing the appeal. You cannot represent to a court something that you
know is false—and that is what the Attorney General’s office appears to have
done. Furthermore, if you present something to a court leading to an incorrect
inference because you have not presented all the facts, it is tantamount to a
lie. And Cuccinelli’s office appears to have done that as well.
In
describing the morning of April 16, 2007, Cuccinelli’s denies a duty to warn
because “multiple police forces on the scene did not believe the campus was in
danger.” That is simply not true. The erroneous decision that the dormitory
double homicide was a “domestic incident” was the decision of one man
alone—Chief Wendell Flinchum. Furthermore, the dead male was gay; there was no
reason for the dead female’s boyfriend to be jealous.
Without
presenting evidence (because there is none), Cuccinelli’s office says school
President Steger “understood … that the perpetrator likely left the campus” and
did not warn. The Attorney General appears to believe that a killer is any less
dangerous after committing murder than before?
Finally,
the Supreme Court is not told of the thirteen bloody footprints leading away
from the crime scene and a bloody thumbprint on a doorknob leading to a
stairwell and a building exit. That alone is evidence to warn immediately.
No comments:
Post a Comment