Following
every gun massacre, politicians say this is “not the time” to discuss the
problem. Who are they kidding? It is the perfect time to discuss gun violence.
If not now, then when is the time to discuss ways to curb gun violence? These
same politicians never say “when” they are willing to have a serious discussion
about ending the carnage. The real problem is our politicians petrified of the
NRA and gun manufacturers.
For
58 people attending an open-air concert in Las Vegas it is too late. It is too
late for the those wounded and killed at Virginia Tech, for the dead and
injured at the Orlando nightclub, for the children and teachers and families at
Sandy Hook, and for the mother of my oldest grandchild who was one of
those killed at the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Virginia. How many
more slaughters are needed until “the time is right?”
After
every tragedy there is a national dialog about what happened and what needs to
be done—after hurricanes, after 9/11, and after floods—but not after mass shootings.
Why not? Those in positions of responsibility don’t have the backbone or
decency to tell the public when the time is right for them to discuss the
killing of innocent children, moviegoers, concert attendees, or people shopping
in malls.
Ah,
the sacrosanct second amendment and our right to own guns. Apparently the
rights to life, liberty and happiness of those killed in these shootings mean nothing compared to a mentally ill person’s right to kill and maim. And, since
January 2017 Congress passed legislation making it easier for people who are
mentally ill to own guns—some of these people who can now legally buy automatic
weapons are so ill they cannot handle their finances—they cannot write a check,
but they can buy a rapid-fire weapon.
I
would like someone to show me where in the Second Amendment anyone is given the
right to indiscriminately kill others. All the amendments to the Constitution
have limitations. The first amendment gives us freedom of speech, but I cannot
slander someone or use foul language. The Second Amendment should have
limitations aimed at preventing shooting rampages. And NOW is the time to talk
about it.
Other
countries such as Great Britain, Australia and Canada have laws and policies in
place that have helped dramatically curb mass shootings. There is nothing that
can prevent all of this violence from taking place. But measures have been
adopted elsewhere that have drastically cut incidents of gun violence.
In
medicine just because you cannot cure all ills, does not mean you stop
trying—the same is true about gun violence. Just because you cannot prevent all
shootings doesn’t mean you stop trying to curb their number and extent. (To be continued)
No comments:
Post a Comment