“Violence is seldom
predictable with any certainty; its precise
timing and location
are even less so. Thus when it comes
to rare but
catastrophic events such as campus rampages,
preventing violence
is more important than foreseeing it.”
~Helen de Haven, associate professor, John
Marshall Law School
The
Chinese characters that make up the word “crisis” include one that may be
translated as “opportunity.” We are a nation in crisis—a gun violence
crisis—and the opportunity to do something about it is now. If the murder of 20
beautiful elementary school children and their teachers, in Newtown,
Connecticut is not enough to spur action to address the crisis, then what is?
If the cold-blooded murder of two volunteer firemen in western New York by a
man who did what he liked doing best, killing people, is not enough to take
action, then what is?
From
Columbine, to the Appalachian School of Law, to Virginia Tech, to Northern
Illinois University, to a Sheikh temple in Wisconsin, to a Connecticut
elementary school, the bodies pile up.
On and on it goes, the unabated gun violence. The self-proclaimed
greatest nation on the earth appears paralyzed in the face of this murderous
rampage. The gun-related deaths are so frequent that they have become as
American as apple pie. The United States
has become the laughing stock of the world if for no other reason than it has
appeared incapable or unwilling to take tough measures to prevent these
slaughters.
Some
naively argue the shootings are God’s will. Others contend that we will never
be able to stop these killings; we are not responsible for what others do. The National Rifle Association insists
that the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. But in
a fit of rage or drunken stupor, a good guy with a gun is just one pull of the
trigger away from being a bad guy. More guns will probably lead to more
carnage, not less. It is just common sense: if you don’t have access to assault
weapons and high capacity magazines, you cannot use them to kill people.
Others
suggest that what is needed is armed guards or police at all of our schools.
Maybe it is. But remember, there was an armed guard at Columbine; Ft. Hood is a
military base with armed personnel everywhere; and Virginia Tech had armed
police on the campus. The presence of armed personnel prevented none of those
shootings.
Still
others insist that guns don’t kill; that banning assault weapons or high
capacity magazines will not stop the killings. Well, as a matter fact, guns do kill, and banning assault weapons and
high capacity magazines would greatly reduce the chances and probability of
mass killings. If you buy the argument that guns don’t kill, then why do we
license other inanimate objects as well as their owners? Cars in the hands of
people addicted to alcohol or drugs or dangerously mentally ill individuals
kill, and we have taken steps to keep cars out of the hands of people in both
categories. Guns kill in the hands of addicts and dangerously mentally ill
people and we need to do the same; we need to keep these weapons out of their
hands. Yet we do nothing, and doing nothing is no longer an option. (To be
continued)
No comments:
Post a Comment