In the Analysis section of
her decision, Justice Powell lays out the Commonwealth’s argument for
dismissing the jury verdict of the Pryde and Peterson lawsuit. She writes on
page eleven: “… we have imposed a duty to
warn of a third party criminal acts [sic] only where there was ‘an imminent
probability of injury’ from a third party act.” What greater indication of imminent violence
does the Virginia Supreme Court need than Ralph Byers words at 8:45 a.m. that
there was a killer on the loose?
On page 15, the final page of
the decision, Judge Powell writes “Most
importantly based on information available at that time, the defendants
believed that the shooter had fled the area and posed no danger to others.”
This sentence is one of the most disturbing and bogus in the report.
1.
There
was absolutely no evidence that the killer had left the campus.
2.
There
was absolutely no evidence the double homicide was the result of a lovers’
triangle.
3.
There
was absolutely no evidence the killer was not a threat to others on the
Virginia Tech campus.
Justice Powell also writes, “Based on the limited information available
to the Commonwealth prior to the shootings in Norris Hall, it cannot be said
that it was or reasonably foreseeable that students in Norris Hall would fall
victim to criminal harm. Thus, as a matter of law, the Commonwealth did not
have a duty to protect students against third party criminal acts.”
If you buy the incorrect
definition of words, concepts and facts that Justice Powell lays out, then the
above is correct. But, unfortunately her words run counter to facts, evidence,
and the truth (I have detailed all of those points in previous postings).
The conclusion of the
decision reads: “Assuming without
deciding that a special relationship existed between the Commonwealth and
Virginia Tech students, based on the specific facts of this case, as a matter
of law, no duty to warn students of harm by a third party criminal arose. Thus,
we will reverse the trial court’s judgment holding that a duty arose and enter
final judgment in favor of the Commonwealth.
I have been involved in Intelligence
and Crime analysis at the CIA and FBI for over 50 years, and currently teach it
in the U.S. Intelligence Community, in Canada, and in Singapore. I have also
taught Intelligence and Crime Analysis at a major Virginia University. If one
of my students engaged in the distortions and untruths contained in Justice Powell’s
decision, I would flunk him or her. This
decision is unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable. (To be continued)
No comments:
Post a Comment